FeaturesContestsReviews
| FinchFinch2008 Mantonio Enterprises
Review by: SydBarrett420 See others by this writer Official Site (link) Only registered users can post comments Published on August 11th 2008
So Finch is back from a self imposed hiatus with a new offering in the form of a four song, self titled EP. The real question is, do people still care about Finch? after their last album polarized their fanbase and set them on the path to an indefinite hiatus, will people still be willing to give Finch a listen? They should, as this EP does an admirable job of attempting to bridge the gap between fans of Say Hello to Sunshine and What it is to Burn.
Please login or register to post comments. What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
This band is a shitty waste. It's seems kind of ignorant to call this band shitty or a waste. Yes, WIITB was arguably generic and uninspired compared to all of the other "alternative" records being released at the time, but the progression in musicianship, lyrical content, and overall creativity was through the roof in Sunshine. I love it. Can an EP, a vessel designed to be brief and build anticipation, really be criticized for being too short? Normally I won't comment just to say something negative about a band or a specific record but this sorry ass band is utter SHIT. Not only are ALL of their records generic trash but their live performance is so unbelievably sloppy and weak it will bring a tear to your eye This band is fuckin' trash. where did all you people come from My fucking God, if one more musical illiterate talks about how great that substandard pile of shit album WIITB is, I'm going to vomit uncontrollably. It wasn't groundbreaking. It wasn't new to anyone who listened to something other than MTV. It wasn't really that good at all. SHTS kills that record deader than Dillinger. 2002 is stoked. need more what it is to burn I don't wanna hear bitching about grammar, spelling, or math since I wrote the review once and hit the submit button and had to go back and fix something and the entire review was gone so I had to write it again and it is indeed an inferior review compared to my first one. i can see you like "chinese organ donors" because every time you want to mention "chinese organ donors" you type out the words "chinese organ donors," but i guess it's worth having the words "chinese organ donors" about 8 times in a sentence because "chinese organ donors" is a good song and you like "chinese organ donors." Score is for McLovin' !! Organ Donar !! and i fuckin loved both those albums btw. that chinese track is pretty dopesick but the rest is kinda average. Why is it that when bands start to fizzle out they release self-titled albums or EPs? woody wood pecker What is up with that cover art? I mean, seriously. That's bad. Heard it. Can't remember a single second of it. This bands logo looks stupid as fuck. Score is for stylized f's in circles. Better than "say hello to sunshine", but it will never compare to "what it is to burn" which is still an amazing album to date. honestly, it's okay. Where as people say its half-What it is to burn, half-Say Hello to sunshine, I think it sounds like they want to play Say Hello to Sunshine, but are half in the door, half out. They don't want to go all out, because we saw where that got them. They need to be themselves. Don't write songs for your fanbase. The people that moved on are probably not into music anymore. Get the new teenies. Get a good marketing crew or label or managment or whatever. "math is unpunx" hahahaha, awesome. "Undoubtedly, the high point of the EP is the epic "Chinese Organ Donors." Clocking in at over seven minutes and spanning a quarter of the album" Fuck Itunes. I don't need to hear this that bad. Score's for me not hearing their music because I refuse to be a bitch. These guys are a little to nu-metaly for me Alex Pappas is still polarized. No thanks. The cover art speaks for itself. |